Member Login

Login
No account yet? Register
 

Search GeoPrac

GeotechSearch.com

Site Sponsors

Even More News and Blog Posts!

New on GeoPrac.net, the Other News and Blogs page has had a major facelift. To supplement our regular GeoNews and Articles, we aggregate news feeds and blog entries from all over the web into one easy to browse source. Check it out!  

Become a Member!

  • Post links
  • Become an author
  • Network with other members
  • Post comments without the security image

Register Now! or Learn More.

Subscribe by Email

Subscribe to GeoPrac.net Headlines by Email. Powered by FeedBurner.com, Don't forget to follow instructions to verify your subscription!

Enter your email address:

RSS Feeds

To subscribe to GeoPrac.net headlines, use one of the buttons below. Or view other available feeds or read more about RSS.

GeotechSearch.com Most Popular Search Terms

Home arrow About arrow RSS Feeds
LRFD for Bridge Substructure Design, Note 1 - Introduction Print E-mail
Written by Naresh C. Samtani   
Monday, 23 April 2007
Article Index
Introduction
1.0 Concept of Limit States
2.0 Common Limit States
3.0 Load Combinations
4.0 Role of Structural and Geotechnical Specialists
Digg!Reddit!
Del.icio.us!Google!
Facebook!Slashdot!
Technorati!StumbleUpon!
Newsvine!Furl!
Yahoo!Ma.gnolia!

2.0 Common Limit States in Bridge Substructure Design

In the AASHTO-LRFD framework, there are five distinct limit states: (a) strength (or ultimate) limit states, (b) serviceability limit states, (c) extreme event limit states, (d) fatigue limit states and (e) constructability limit states.  For most cases, the routine design of a bridge or a component is generally governed by either the strength or the service limit states.  These common limit states are briefly discussed below (Samtani and Nowatzki, 2006):

  • Strength (or ultimate) limit states are limit states that pertain to structural safety.  These limit states may be reached through either geotechnical or structural failure.  Evaluation of strength limit states is based on inelastic behavior of the structure, which is accomplished by using increased or factored loads (i.e., γ > 1.0) and on modification of soil behavior, which is accomplished by using reduced or factored strengths (i.e., φ < 1.0).  From a geotechnical viewpoint, strength limit states are reached when they involve the partial or total collapse of the structure due to sliding, bearing capacity failure, etc.  For well-designed structures strength limit states have a low probability of occurrence.
  • Serviceability limit states are the limiting conditions affecting the function of the structure under expected service conditions.   Serviceability limit states occur before collapse.  These include conditions that may restrict the intended use of the structure, e.g., excessive total or differential settlements, cracking, local damage, rough rideability, etc.  Evaluation of serviceability limit states is usually performed by using expected service loads (i.e., load factors = 1.0), nominal strengths (i.e., resistance factors = 1.0) and elastic analyses.  Compared to strength limit states, the serviceability limits states have a higher probability of occurrence but, if exceeded, involve less danger of loss of life.


Trackback(0)
Comments (0)add comment

Write comment
quote
bold
italicize
underline
strike
url
image
quote
quote
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley

security image
Write the displayed characters


busy
Last Updated ( Thursday, 20 September 2007 )
 
< Prev

Site Sponsors

Users Online

No Users Online

Statistics

Members: 126
News: 366
Web Links: 127

GeoPrac.net © 2007 Randy Post unless noted.
Terms of Use | Copyright Info | Privacy Policy | Disclaimer | Sitemap

Other Randy Post Sites: RnRPost.com | NameDrawing.net