|
LRFD for Bridge Substructure Design, Note 1 - Introduction |
|
|
|
Written by Naresh C. Samtani
|
|
Monday, 23 April 2007 |
|
Page 3 of 5
2.0 Common Limit States in Bridge Substructure Design
In the AASHTO-LRFD framework, there
are five distinct limit states: (a) strength (or ultimate) limit states, (b)
serviceability limit states, (c) extreme event limit states, (d) fatigue limit
states and (e) constructability limit states.
For most cases, the routine design of a bridge or a component is
generally governed by either the strength or the service limit states. These common limit states are briefly
discussed below (Samtani and Nowatzki, 2006):
- Strength (or ultimate) limit states are limit
states that pertain to structural safety.
These limit states may be reached through either geotechnical or
structural failure. Evaluation of
strength limit states is based on inelastic behavior of the structure, which is
accomplished by using increased or factored loads (i.e., γ > 1.0) and on modification of soil
behavior, which is accomplished by using reduced or factored strengths (i.e., φ < 1.0).
From a geotechnical viewpoint, strength limit states are reached when
they involve the partial or total collapse of the structure due to sliding,
bearing capacity failure, etc. For
well-designed structures strength limit states have a low probability of
occurrence.
- Serviceability limit states are the limiting
conditions affecting the function of the structure under expected service conditions. Serviceability
limit states occur before collapse.
These include conditions that may restrict the intended use of the
structure, e.g., excessive total or differential settlements, cracking, local
damage, rough rideability, etc.
Evaluation of serviceability limit states is usually performed by using
expected service loads (i.e., load factors = 1.0), nominal strengths (i.e.,
resistance factors = 1.0) and elastic analyses.
Compared to strength limit states, the serviceability limits states have
a higher probability of occurrence but, if exceeded, involve less danger of
loss of life.
Trackback(0)
|
|
Last Updated ( Thursday, 20 September 2007 )
|