Member Login

Login
No account yet? Register
 

Search GeoPrac

Site Sponsors

Even More News and Blog Posts!

New on GeoPrac.net, the Other News and Blogs page has had a major facelift. To supplement our regular GeoNews and Articles, we aggregate news feeds and blog entries from all over the web into one easy to browse source. Check it out!  

Become an Author

GeoPrac.net is a community site, we are only as good as the content our members contribute!

Whether it's a one time contribution, or a monthly or quarterly article, please consider becoming an author

Subscribe by Email

Subscribe to GeoPrac.net Headlines by Email. Powered by FeedBurner.com, Don't forget to follow instructions to verify your subscription!

Enter your email address:

RSS Feeds

To subscribe to GeoPrac.net headlines, use one of the buttons below. Or view other available feeds or read more about RSS.

Home arrow GeoNews arrow Sheet Piling Controversy in New Orleans
Sheet Piling Controversy in New Orleans
Written by Randy Post   
Monday, 16 April 2007
Digg!Reddit!
Del.icio.us!Google!
Facebook!Slashdot!
Technorati!StumbleUpon!
Newsvine!Furl!
Yahoo!Ma.gnolia!

An article by the New Orleans Times-Picayune reports that some of the sheet piles used in the levee along the 17th Street Canal are only 4.5-ft below sea level. The US Army Corps of Engineers say they have done "the most extensive technical analysis ever performed" on the drainage canal, but at least one person is not finding comfort in that claim. (Photo by pixelshutter20)

One of the principal concerns with the shallow embedment is that of seepage forces causing piping and undermining of the sheet pile wall and a subsequent failure such as what happened with the failure of the London Canal. The USACOE says that the safe water level in the 17th Street canal has now been lowered to 6-ft. However University of California-Berkeley engineer Bob Bea when asked about the shallow sheet piling said "Now I'm hearing 4 1/2 feet, and even with a safe water level of 6, that gives me the heeby-jeebies."

Bea further questions why an independent review of the USACE's IPET report has not been performed. He was a member of the Independent Levee Inspection Team financed by the National Science Foundation. In the Times-Picayune article, he was quoted as saying:

"When are these guys going to learn? This is like running into the gang of bullies who beat you up yesterday and having them say, 'Trust us today,'¤" Bea said. "Nineteen months after Katrina, they're still checking their own work. They should be inviting peer review and welcoming collaboration as a way of showing that they really want to move forward together."

However, a March 26, 2007 press release by the USACE regarding the IPET report states that it was peer reviewed by "an External Review Panel of national experts from the American Society of Civil Engineers and by the National Academies - National Research Council Committee on New Orleans Hurricane Protection Projects".

The Interim Final IPET report is available at https://ipet.wes.army.mil.

Trackback(0)
Comments (0)add comment

Write comment

busy
 

Site Sponsors

Users Online

No Users Online

Statistics

Members: 102
News: 353
Web Links: 113

GeoPrac.net © 2007 Randy Post unless noted.
Terms of Use | Copyright Info | Privacy Policy | Disclaimer | Sitemap

Other Randy Post Sites: RnRPost.com | NameDrawing.net