Member Login

Login
No account yet? Register
 

Search GeoPrac

GeotechSearch.com

Site Sponsors

Even More News and Blog Posts!

New on GeoPrac.net, the Other News and Blogs page has had a major facelift. To supplement our regular GeoNews and Articles, we aggregate news feeds and blog entries from all over the web into one easy to browse source. Check it out!  

Become an Author

GeoPrac.net is a community site, we are only as good as the content our members contribute!

Whether it's a one time contribution, or a monthly or quarterly article, please consider becoming an author

Subscribe by Email

Subscribe to GeoPrac.net Headlines by Email. Powered by FeedBurner.com, Don't forget to follow instructions to verify your subscription!

Enter your email address:

RSS Feeds

To subscribe to GeoPrac.net headlines, use one of the buttons below. Or view other available feeds or read more about RSS.

GeotechSearch.com Most Popular Search Terms

Home arrow GeoNews arrow Browse by Category arrow Miscellaneous arrow FHWA State Geotechnical Workshops
FHWA State Geotechnical Workshops Print E-mail
Written by Randy Post   
Monday, 27 August 2007
Article Index
FHWA State Geotechnical Workshops
Aesthetic Cut Slopes
 Characteristics of Enhancements
 Short Range Perspective
 Long Range Perspective
Rock Excavation Techniques
Conclusions
Digg!Reddit!
Del.icio.us!Google!
Facebook!Slashdot!
Technorati!StumbleUpon!
Newsvine!Furl!
Yahoo!Ma.gnolia!

“AESTHETICALLY PLEASING” CUT SLOPES

Developing Rational Criteria

For rock cut slopes, aesthetic criteria have often been expressed in contract documents and environmental assessments using language such as:

  • “blend with the natural terrain”
  • “reflect the form, line, color, and texture of natural formations”
  • “natural-appearing cut slopes”
  • “roughened cut slopes”
  • “mimic natural land forms”

and so forth. Although this may be meaningful to landscape architects and others who have an intuitive understanding of the desired finished product, road building contractors and engineering designers find such language imprecise and confusing. Others within the highway engineering community may see attempts to “naturalize” the appearance of rock cut slopes as opening the door to slope instability and liability exposure. These individuals express a preference for more economical, steeper cut slopes excavated using techniques that minimize rock disturbance and produce a planar, uniform, and engineered appearance.

Even though the process of constructing “natural appearing” cut slopes does not preserve rock mass integrity and construction economy to the same degree as rigorously controlled cut slopes, there are aesthetic enhancement techniques that acceptably improve the visual characteristics while retaining an acceptable degree of rock slope stability and economy.

The key is to develop a working partnership between the highway development and recreational land management agencies to make the aesthetic criteria deterministic, rational, biddable, and constructible.

The need for aesthetic enhancement is driven by regulatory and management requirements that highway engineers and constructors may view as arbitrary. However, there is practical justification. This justification derives from three main factors. First, for many highway users, travel to the recreational site is an important part of the overall recreation experience. Having a more attractive highway extends the recreational experience. Second, in areas of high scenic quality, an economic as well as social value may be attached to the scenic highway designation. Users are attracted to the area, its campgrounds, and its towns. Third, the view enjoyed by off highway recreationists is an important part of their experience. Hikers and campers who do not have to travel as far to put themselves in a natural setting are more likely to use the area.

Understanding these factors can form the basis of a rational and deterministic process in design and construction. In essence, the design team must define who exactly is to be served by the improved aesthetics and what their visual perspective is, and how much enhancement is appropriate.



Trackback(0)
Comments (0)add comment

Write comment
quote
bold
italicize
underline
strike
url
image
quote
quote
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley

security image
Write the displayed characters


busy
Last Updated ( Monday, 27 August 2007 )
 
< Prev   Next >

Site Sponsors

Users Online

No Users Online

Statistics

Members: 159
News: 371
Web Links: 129

GeoPrac.net © 2007 Randy Post unless noted.
Terms of Use | Copyright Info | Privacy Policy | Disclaimer | Sitemap

Other Randy Post Sites: RnRPost.com | NameDrawing.net