Important Info

Featured Sponsor

Become an Author

GeoPrac.net is a community site, we are only as good as the content our members contribute! Whether it's a one time contribution, or a monthly or quarterly article, please consider becoming an author!

Latest Comments in...

Video of Highway 101 Landslide in California
Looks like the Facebook video gets cropped when I embedded it here. You ca
San Francisco Millennium Tower Has Settled 16 Inches
Misrepresents actual foundation geometry. Photos show deep excavation to ne
New FHWA Soil Nail Manual Addresses LRFD, Hollow Bars
Good evening from Barcelona, Spain. I am witting to you because of I am le
Engineering Geologists vs Geological Engineers vs Geotechnic
Geological engineer from Spain (looking for job smiley geoengineer.martin@gmail
Content
Yucca Mountain Solution for Nevada's Budget Deficit? PDF Print E-mail
Written by Randy Post   
Monday, 24 November 2008 12:28

Yucca Mountain Nuclear Waste Repository Schematic Drawing by US Nuclear Regulatory ComissionThe Center for Yucca Facts has presented a letter to the chairman of the Spending and Government Efficiency Commission (SAGE) of the State of Nevada recommending that an objective look at the proposed Yucca Mountain Nuclear Waste Repository might show that it provides a solution to Nevada's budgetary dilemmas. More after the break.

In his letter dated November 20, 2008, Chuck Muth, the President of the Center for Yucca Facts points out that the State of Nevada has a more than $1 Billion deficit that must be bridged and Governor Gibbons has stated that "all options are on the table". So what could be the financial benefit to Nevada with an operating Yucca Mountain?

Sen. James Inhofe (R-Oklahoma) submitted an amendment (SA 4931) to the Lieberman-Warner Climate Security Act of 2008 (S 3036) last June. Section 1824 of the amendment ("Agreement with State of Nevada") calls for the Secretary of Energy to enter into a benefits agreement with the Governor of Nevada whereby the state would receive:

  • $100 million a year during the licensing review phase (going on right now)
  • $250 million a year during the construction phase (not including all the high-paying jobs the project would create) and,
  • $500 million a year – about half of Nevada's current budget deficit - once spent nuclear fuel begins to arrive for storage.

It should be noted that this is just an "opening ante" which has been offered to Nevada without Nevada even participating in any negotiations. Clearly it is reasonable to suspect that such compensation could be substantially higher if the state would simply come to the table.

Source: SAGE Asked to Put Yucca on Table at the Center for Yucca Facts Website.

 

Hits: 15612
Trackback(0)
Comments (0)add comment

Write comment

security image
Write the displayed characters


busy
Possibly Related News Items (Automagically Generated)
Last Updated on Monday, 24 November 2008 13:01